• Home
  • formula-1
  • Film of the Bianchi crash under lock and key: Is Jules Bianchi complicit in the accident?

Film of the Bianchi crash under lock and key: Is Jules Bianchi complicit in the accident?

ams
Film of the Bianchi crash under lock and key
Subscriptions & booklets

Via the s Severe crash of Jules Bianchi at the Japanese GP has been written a lot. Also a lot that does not correspond to the facts. Which is also due to the fact that evidence is deliberately withheld. The FIA ​​does not want to protect itself or the race management, but Jules Bianchi himself.

Marussia oversteers, Bianchi overreacts

The film of the accident and the telemetry data may show that the driver is is complicit. One of the officials said: 'It would be unfair to Bianchi because he cannot defend himself at the moment.'

The fact is: there are film recordings of the accident. This does not mean the video of a viewer who filmed in the run-off zone of the Dunlop curve and published the recordings on YouTube. The official world signal missed the crash. The cameraman in turn 7 swiveled away at the crucial moment.

But the track cameras positioned in the curve recorded the accident. And it shows that Bianchi, unlike Adrian Sutil, does not turn before his departure. The Marussia oversteers, Bianchi overreacts, and then the car shoots straight ahead at high speed into the recovery crane.

Double yellow is enough for the danger in curve 7

What can be seen on the document is currently kept under lock and key, as is telemetry values ​​on the initial speed and the delay when impacting the mountain tractor. The FIA ​​and the race management prefer to accept criticism of their safety measures. She has the option of rectification. One of the big points of discussion is why no safety car went onto the track when Sutil flew off the track.

The reason for this is that the Sauber was stuck in the tire wall and as far from the edge of the track as possible . In addition, the recovery personnel in Suzuka are extremely experienced. You need less than one lap to remove the car.

If the process had taken longer or if the Sauber had been thrown back to the edge of the track, a safety car would have hit the track. According to the security experts, however, double yellow was an effective meansBrake the driver at this point. Most of them have also paid tribute to the danger.

Only accelerate after the green flag

There was criticism also for the green flag , which was waved 15 seconds before Bianchi's impact at post 12 shortly after the impact point. Could she have led Bianchi to step on the gas again?

Two things become clear based on testimony. Bianchi could not have seen the green flag in the blind curve at the time of departure. And had he seen her it would have been irrelevant. He shouldn't have accelerated until he passed Post 12 and the green light on his steering wheel monitor went on. So behind the scene of the accident.

The allegations also included why the cars were still archaically recovered with a tractor and not with a crane that is positioned outside the route. A security expert replied: 'Then three to four marshals would have had to stabilize the car in front of the guardrail. In that case, they would have been dead. The driver, no matter who it is, would probably have been banned for a long time if he could be proven that he was too fast.

'You cannot expect the marshals to have to work at risk of death. There is an order of who has to bear which residual risk. The spectators deserve the greatest protection. Then there are marshals and, in third place, the drivers. They are the only ones who know what they are getting into. '

Punish drivers harder for speeding violations?

A total of 12 recovery cranes are in use. It has already been decided that the helpers with heavy equipment are only allowed to move out if they have the express permission of the race management. In Suzuka, the recovery teams often act on their own initiative. They have a routine of more than 20 years and are among the most efficient on the GP calendar.

In the medium term, there is a discussion of whether drivers should be punished harder for those who are less than twice ge flag waved not slow down. It doesn't matter if a crash happens or not. That would have a deterrent effect. A speed limit is also being reconsidered. But there are many things to consider. The speed limit must be flexible depending on the section of the route. And it must be ensured that the driver is on the transitiondo not apply the brakes and cause secondary accidents there.

2 Comments

joseph cook

2021-12-07 15:25:04

I find this article disturbing, sensationalist and harmful. No evidence is provided, and loss of traction means the car does not turn and goes straight. No evidence is provided here. The author would have had to see the hands on the steering wheel and even then you would have to make certain assumptions as to why the hand steering movements were what they were. This is ridiculous and unacceptable. No evidence is provided in the form of video by the author or anything. This is deeply traumatic and harmful in potential and is unacceptable. I shall be contacting authorities to make a formal complaint.

joseph cook

2021-12-07 15:26:06

I find this article disturbing, sensationalist and harmful. No evidence is provided, and loss of traction means the car does not turn and goes straight. No evidence is provided here. The author would have had to see the hands on the steering wheel and even then you would have to make certain assumptions as to why the hand steering movements were what they were. This is ridiculous and unacceptable. No evidence is provided in the form of video by the author or anything. This is deeply traumatic and harmful in potential and is unacceptable. I shall be contacting authorities to make a formal complaint.

Leave a reply

Name *