• Home
  • formula-1
  • EU Commission examines Formula 1: & # 34; Result by the start of the 2016 season & # 34;

EU Commission examines Formula 1: & # 34; Result by the start of the 2016 season & # 34;

EU Commission examines Formula 1
Subscriptions & booklets

D he rights holders, the FIA ​​and the big teams of Formula 1 look anxiously to Brussels. Only Bernie Ecclestone ignores Force India and Sauber's formal lawsuit against injustices in the distribution of revenue and the decision-making process. One can assume that the lawsuit fits into his concept. It could be a rude awakening for everyone else.

The rights holders will find it difficult to sell Formula 1 as long as there is legal uncertainty. At least not at the price they would like to have. The FIA ​​has to fear for the lush apanage of around 40 million dollars from the pot of rights holders and for the allocation of shares in an IPO.

On the other hand, it would get back the right to determine the rules alone. The big teams would lose their bonus payments and in the worst case would have to repay money wrongly distributed in 2014 and 2015. Ferrari must fear for its veto right.

Result of the EU lawsuit within 6 months

Anyone who thinks that the mills in Brussels are grinding slowly could be mistaken. After Force India and Sauber have submitted their documents, the EU Commission is waiting for the other side's documents. CVC has to prove why everything is in order with the contested parts of the contract.

It was signaled to the plaintiffs that a result can be expected within the next six months. 'If everything goes well, we'll have an answer by Christmas. Otherwise, I think we'll get clarity before the start of the 2016 season at the latest,' hopes Force India team boss Bob Fernley.

The EU Commission will be in a first Step decide whether an investigation will be carried out at all. That depends on the evidence Force India and Sauber have brought into their case and the response from the rights holders.

If the Brussels commissioners announce an investigation, it is already a victory. Most of the time, those involved then look for a solution that satisfies the commissioners. 'Experience shows that most people want to save a lengthy investigation because it disrupts business,' says Fernley.

Wrong In the future was wrong in the past

In the past, the teams would not have dared to make such a move because they feared reprisals from Bernie Ecclestone or the FIA.But neither Force India nor Sauber have heard a bad word from Ecclestone. One can therefore assume that Bernie secretly sympathizes with the rebels.

The EU could solve many of his problems. A dissolution of the current financial contract would break the power of the big teams and engine manufacturers because it would mean the end of the strategy group. And she would break the blockade in the event of rule changes.

Force India and Sauber secretly hope that a positive decision will bring them an unexpected windfall. That is when the privileged teams have to reimburse their bonus payments from previous years.

Fernley does not consider this to be ruled out: 'What should be wrong in the future was also wrong in the past.' Ecclestone doesn't believe in it. 'There are contracts. I don't think the EU Commission is asking us to break these contracts.'


Leave a reply

Name *